Comparative Evaluation of two new non-compliance devices for the treatment of skeletal classes II and III malocclusions (second and third class resolver-S&TCR) and Herbst Appliance
نویسنده
چکیده
The correction of Class II and Class III malocclusions is often hampered by the use of appliances that require the collaboration of the patient (headgear, Delaire mask, elastics or the wearing of a removable appliance). Non-compliance therapy involves the use of appliances which minimize the need for such co-operation and attempt to maximize the predictability of results. The aim of this article is to describe the characteristics, indications, advantages and mechanism of action of two innovative appliances and compare them to a device widely used as the Herbst appliance, based on currently available data.
منابع مشابه
SURVEY ON THE SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF BETA ANGLE IN DIFFERENTIATING SKELETAL CLASS II AND III MALOCCLUSIONS FROM CLASS I
Background & Aims: A successful treatment in the field of medical sciences depends on an accurate diagnosis. In orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning also analyzing the sagittal jaw base relationship is important. Various methods have been suggested for this. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of beta angle in sagittal jaw base relationship diagnosis. Materials & Methods: In t...
متن کاملEvaluation of Mandibular Third Molar Positions in Various Vertical Skeletal Malocclusions
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the position of mandibular third molar (M3) and vertical skeletal malocclusions. Methods: Materials for the study consisted of panoramic radiographs and lateral cephalograms of 73 fifteen to nineteen-year-old class I patients (girls=66%, boys= 34%). Patients were classified into three groups based on four vertical ...
متن کاملComparison of Frankel Regulator and Cervera Appliance in Functional Treatment of Class II Malocclusions: A Systematic Review
Background: The Class II Malocclusion is the most frequent dento-skeletal anomaly that involves one third of all orthodontic patients. So many appliances have been described in the literature for treating this malocclusion, in particular when it’s indicated to obtain a mandibular advancement. The aim of this study is to compare the dental and skeletal effects of Frankel II Regulator and Cervera...
متن کاملMini-implants and the efficiency of Herbst treatment: a preliminary study
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study is to present the use of a modified Herbst appliance in association with temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in order to enhance the correction of skeletal class II malocclusions. METHODS Ten consecutive adolescents scheduled for Herbst treatment were assigned to two treatment groups. Five cases were treated with a modified miniscrew-supported Herbst applia...
متن کاملOrthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in adult Class II Division 1 treatment: mandibular sagittal split osteotomy versus Herbst appliance.
The aim of this study was to assess to what extent adult Herbst treatment is an alternative to orthognathic surgery by comparing the dentoskeletal treatment effects in 46 adult Class II Division 1 subjects treated with a combined orthodontic-orthognathic surgery approach (mandibular sagittal split osteotomy without genioplasty) and 23 adult Class II Division 1 subjects treated with the Herbst a...
متن کامل